Make sure to accept the HIT before you start answering the questions.
${Categorization}
Section 1: Little Knowledge
This section tests your understanding of basic ontology components and the ability to recognise them in graphical and textual representations.
Consider the model, represented in 3 equivalent formalisms (VOWL | Rector | Warren) and answer questions 1 & 2 below.
VOWL
Rector
PersonTypeA has, amongst other things, some daughters, and some sons, and also only dog pets.
Warren
PersonTypeA has, amongst other things, at least one daughter, at least one son, and also no other than dog pets.
1. Identify the main model components from the model
2. Identifying the different quantifiers from the model
Continue to Section 2
Section 2: Some Knowledge
This section tests your understanding of the implications of ontology axioms and restrictions.
Consider the model, represented in 3 equivalent formalisms (VOWL | Rector | Warren) and answer question 3 below.
VOWL
Rector
PetLoverTypeA has, amongst other things, only Dog pets.
Warren
PetLoverTypeA has, amongst other things, no other than Dog pets.
3. Select the statement that describes instances of PetLoverTypeA correctly.
Consider the model, represented in 3 equivalent formalisms (VOWL | Rector | Warren) and answer question 4 below.
VOWL
Rector
PetLoverTypeB has, amongst other things, some Cat pets.
Warren
PetLoverTypeB has, amongst other things, at least one Cat pet.
4. Select the statement that describes instances of PetLoverTypeB correctly.
Consider the model, represented in 3 equivalent formalisms (VOWL | Rector | Warren) and answer question 5 below.
VOWL
Rector
PetLoverTypeC has, amongst other things, only Cat pets and only Dog pets. There are no individuals that can be both of type Dog and type Cat.
Warren
PetLoverTypeC has, amongst other things, no other than Cat pets and no other than Dog pets. There are no individuals that can be both of type Dog and type Cat.
Continue to Section 3
Section 3: Expert Knowledge
This section tests your ability to reason with ontology models, as well as compare and relate them to each other.
Consider models A and B both describing PetLoverTypeE, each represented in 3 equivalent formalisms (VOWL | Rector | Warren) and answer question 6 below.
Model A: PetLoverTypeE
Model B: PetLoverTypeE
VOWL
VOWL
Rector
Rector
PetLoverTypeE has, amongst other things, some Cat pets and some Dog pets and also only Cat and Dog pets.
PetLoverTypeE has, amongst other things, some Cat pets and some Dog pets.
Warren
Warren
PetLoverTypeE has, amongst other things, at least one Cat pet and at least one Dog pet and also no other than Cat and Dog pets.
PetLoverTypeE has, amongst other things, at least one Cat pet and at least one Dog pet.
6. Select the correct statement about models A and B describing PetLoverTypeE.
Consider models A and B describing PetLoverTypeD and PerLoverTypeF, each represented in 3 equivalent formalisms (VOWL | Rector | Warren) and answer question 7 below.
Model A: PetLoverTypeD
Model B: PerLoverTypeF
VOWL
VOWL
Rector
Rector
PetLoverTypeD has, amongst other things, some pets that are not Dogs.
PetLoverTypeF has, amongst other things, only Dog pets.
Warren
Warren
PetLoverTypeD has, amongst other things, at least one pet that is not a Dog.
PetLoverTypeF has, amongst other things, no other than Dog pets.
7. Is it true that PetLoverTypeD is disjoint to PetLoverTypeF? That is, there can be no instance that is at the same time of type PetLoverTypeD and PetLoverTypeF.
Consider models A and B describing PetLoverTypeG and PerLoverTypeF, each represented in 3 equivalent formalisms (VOWL | Rector | Warren) and answer question 8 below.
Model A: PetLoverTypeG
Model B: PerLoverTypeF
VOWL
VOWL
Rector
Rector
PetLoverTypeG has, amongst other things, only pets that are not Dogs.
PetLoverTypeF has, amongst other things, only Dog pets.
Warren
Warren
PetLoverTypeG has, amongst other things, pets that are no other than not Dogs.
PetLoverTypeF has, amongst other things, no other than Dog pets.
8. Is it true that PetLoverTypeG is disjoint to PetLoverTypeF? That is, there can be no instance that is at the same time of type PetLoverTypeG and PetLoverTypeF.
Consider models A and B describing PetLoverTypeD and PerLoverTypeH, each represented in 3 equivalent formalisms (VOWL | Rector | Warren) and answer question 9 below.
Model A: PetLoverTypeD
Model B: PerLoverTypeH
VOWL
VOWL
Rector
Rector
PetLoverTypeD has, amongst other things, some pets that are not Dogs.
PetLoverTypeH has, amongst other things, some Dog pets.
Warren
Warren
PetLoverTypeD has, amongst other things, at least one pet that is not a Dog.
PetLoverTypeH has, amongst other things, at least one Dog pet.
9. Is it true that PetLoverTypeD is disjoint to PetLoverTypeH? That is, there can be no instance that is at the same time of type PetLoverTypeD and PetLoverTypeH.